Rick Baker Thought Posts
Left Menu Space Holder

About the author

Name of author Rick Baker, P.Eng.

E-mail me Send mail
Follow me LinkedIn Twitter

Search

Calendar

<<  April 2024  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

View posts in large calendar

Recent Comments

Comment RSS

Thought Tweet #707

by Rick Baker
On Apr 2, 2013

Thought Tweet #707 "There's a time and a place"...that's about SituationsHow to be and how not to be in situations, that is the question.


The Thinking Behind The Tweet

We have been taught and we have learned this. So we adjust our behaviour to fit our perception of Situations. Put another way - Situations provide a container for behaviour and our behaviour flows from one situation-container to the next situation-container to the next situation-container and so on.

All of us act like actors. We act all day long...adjusting to the time and the place...adjusting to the situation. Each of us plays a number of roles. Real-life situations are snapshots of scenes...the types of scenes we see acted out in plays, movies, and TV shows. Scenes contain people and process. The scripts embedded in our heads define the way we will act in given situations. We can accept those scripts or we can re-write them. We have that choice. We can decide how we want to act in given situations...even the most-challenging situations. We have choices.

How to be and how not to be in situations, that is the question.

Tags:

Business Contains Only 3 Things | Humour | Thought Tweets

Where would you draw the line on workplace conflicts?

by Rick Baker
On Mar 28, 2013

People battle one another.

That’s happened for millennia. 


 

So, we should not be too surprised to see interpersonal battles in today’s workplaces.

However, it seems to me situations of in-your-face employee-employee and boss-subordinate conflicts are increasingly more common.

That’s a Problem.

[In the old days…say the 1980’s] When I started my career, overt dysfunction was not that common. Sure, ‘the boss’ was regularly the subject of behind-the-scenes discussion...covert dysfunction existed  but it did not permeate the workplace atmosphere. Sure, ‘the boss’ regularly made it clear that ‘he who carries the gold makes the rules’. Bosses favoured some folks over others. And, some people simply could not get along with others. However, a bar was set … ensuring a level of civility, respect, and order in the workplace.

What would have been grounds for dismissal in the old days thrives with impunity today.

In other words – too many people are getting away with too-bad behavior: 

  • too many people wearing their home-hearts on their work-sleeves,
  • too much employee-to-employee incivility,
  • too many people refusing to follow bosses’ instructions,
  • too many people refusing to treat co-workers with respect,
  • too many people sabotaging other’s work, &
  • all of this eats away at people`s energy and company`s profits & ability to compete.

Too many people are getting away with too-bad behavior: they are gnawing up energy and profits…and they are getting away with it.

If you disagree, if you believe these things are not a problem at the workplaces you see then your organization and your colleagues must be operating better than some of the folks I see in action:

  • Why? Why is that the case?
  • How? How are you and your colleagues drawing the lines, making sure people are playing fair at work?
  • What? What specific actions did you take? (at the time of hiring?, in conjunction with performance reviews? other actions?)

If you agree, if you believe the balance between personal interests/problems and workplace needs has gotten out of whack then:

  • Do you intend to take action?
  • Why? Why do you think it is necessary to take action?
  • How? How do you plan to take action?
  • What? What specific actions will you take?

How do you recommend drawing the lines on workplace conflicts? 

 

The bottom line...

Draw lines on workplace conflict

Tags:

Attitude: Creating Positive Attitude | Business Contains Only 3 Things | Leaders' Thoughts

Thought Tweet #703

by Rick Baker
On Mar 27, 2013

Thought Tweet #703 I believe Leaders should provide Opportunities…that’s an obligation in the Leadership role.

 

The Thinking Behind The Tweet

  1. Napoleon Bonaparte is reported to have said, "Circumstances-what are circumstances? I make circumstances”. If he could do it so can we.
  2. Problems often are the seeds that grow Opportunities. So, P=2S+O
  3. Leaders are in the best position to create Opportunities

Tags:

Business Contains Only 3 Things | Solutions & Opportunities | Thought Tweets

There is no Magic Formula For Hiring

by Rick Baker
On Mar 21, 2013

Some time ago, I wrote,

"When it comes to filling roles at your company, rather than dwelling on who is right and who is wrong,  business leaders should dwell on 2 things:

  1. Character Differences…particularly, the interplay between individual’s egos
  2. Individual’s Talents…particularly, the extent individual’s talents deliver value to the business"  [for more thoughts in that area, see Getting The Right People on Your Bus]

A little later, I wrote,

"In a 2011 Canadian Corporate Culture study, 85% of respondents indicated that cultural fit is more important than necessary skills when hiring

When you are hiring a person to join your business you must work to understand whether or not they will 'fit in' your business Culture.

That means at least 3 things:

  1. You must understand your business Culture and the details of its embedded Values and your rules [our Master Rules],
  2. You must understand the employee-candidate's personal Values, and 
  3. You must determine whether or not the employee-candidate is compatible with our business Culture."    [for more thoughts in that area, see Having Values, Delivering Value, & Recruiting Great People]

Why did I write those points?

I wrote them because I have witnessed many people recruiting at the 50% level. I mean, when they are recruiting they do half the work they need to do:

  • they cover the tangible-technical aspects of the role, making sure credentials are in place, spending time figuring out the candidate's ability to perform the key of the role, etc. and Tasks
  • they fail to cover the intangible aspects of the role such as culture fit, values fit, etc.
A month ago, I was involved in a very-interesting discussion about how to make sure leaders know how to apply the right people-talents to the right-work tasks. To sum up my view, we should not attempt to force round talents into square tasks or square talents into round tasks. Rather, we should spend more time than we now spend making sure we 'customize' roles and tasks to ensure people-talents mesh with the work we are asking them to do. It became clear to me, I was not communicating my thoughts clearly enough. People were interpreting my comments to mean leaders need to go the extra mile then another mile then another...meanwhile followers/workers/staff bore none of the burden.
 
I did not want people interpreting my views as leaders must fully bend over backwards while everyone else could relax and have it their way.
 
So, a month ago, I wrote an article called Right Butts, Right Buses, Right Seats, & Right Tasks. This article expands on the earlier thoughts [introduced above].
 
Now - 
 
There is no Magic Formula For Hiring.
 
When I say that, I mean:
  • We cannot hire with perfection....no matter how thorough we prepare and perform, there is no way to guarantee hiring process perfection
  • No candidate will be perfect for the role...i.e., no candidate will be able to perform all aspects of the role perfectly. That applies whether we are referring to the hard-tangible-technical tasks of the role or the soft-intangible-interpersonal tasks of the role.
  • We must be diligent - we won't be perfect.
So, we should set simple rules for hiring process. Some of the rules should cover off the people side. Some of the rules should cover off the job-technical side. The rules should include flexibility so we can maximize the meshing of people-talents and role-tasks. 

Here are some hiring realities:
  1. Uncertainty is always the scenario: none of us can foresee the future. The best we can do is make predictions and make adjustments as less-desirable-than-forecast situations arise. 
  2. Waiting for perfection is a luxury few can afford. Working for perfection is a strategy for disappointment. 
  3. Have a thorough hiring process…but do not aim for perfection. Communicate openly…about tangible/technical facts and the intangible aspects of your business culture/environment. Involve many people…so your company and the candidate have the ability to observe one another…over a period of time. Be thorough. And take action.

The bottom line...

We must keep working at improving our hiring.

Mastering Commander's Intent

by Rick Baker
On Mar 1, 2013

People resist being too constrained under firm rules, processes, and controls.

That's because people value independence, the ability to influence and control situations, and the ability to satisfy their curiosity and innate creativity.

People stray and wander, maybe even flounder or breaks laws, when given full freedom and autonomy.

That's because people struggle with self-control and are prone to choose short-term gratification over long-term gratification.

The extremes of too-much process and too-little process are gardens for dysfunction. When we apply too-much process, expecting people to follow our instructions and 'do things right' most people resist. When we apply too-little process, expecting people to be innovative and 'do the right things', most people fail to excel.

So - what must business leaders do?

Business leaders must:

Thought Tweet #683

by Rick Baker
On Feb 27, 2013

Thought Tweet #683 It seems to me a person needs 3 things to excel in the world of business: Intelligence, Self-Control, & Drive. Do you agree?

 

The Thinking Behind The Tweet

Business Contains Only 3 Things: People, Process, & Situations. [That's a key piece of Spirited Leaders' philosophy]

People who excel possess: Intelligence, Self-Control, & Drive.

Copyright © 2012. W.F.C (Rick) Baker. All Rights Reserved.