Rick Baker Thought Posts
Left Menu Space Holder

About the author

Name of author Rick Baker, P.Eng.

E-mail me Send mail
Follow me LinkedIn Twitter

Search

Calendar

<<  November 2024  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
2345678

View posts in large calendar

Recent Comments

Comment RSS

‘Creative Engineer’ is not oxymoronic!

by Rick Baker
On Oct 11, 2013

‘Creative Engineer’ is not an oxymoronic pairing of words.

I know this for a fact.

For example…

  1. Take a big bowl right out of its box. 
  2. Take a handful of entrepreneurial spirit. 
  3. Add a sprig of philosophical curiosity. 
  4. Blend these and some other stuff together vigorously until you get stuff on your shirt, on the counter-top, and on the floor.
  5. Using your mind's eye, lay the result out on a multi-coloured whiteboard.
  6. See the surprising things that rise to the top, even while they are half-baked. 

Tags:

Beyond Business | Curiosity - Invention, Innovation & Creativity

Thought Tweet #827.5

by Rick Baker
On Sep 17, 2013

Thought Tweet #827.5 Take your big treasure chest of Curiosity off the shelf...dust it off...open it up...and put its contents to good use.


The Thinking Behind The Tweet

At one time, you were an incessantly curious and creative person. You were chock full of curiosity. Over the years and through the criticism, you've locked much of your curiosity away...right beside your childhood dreams...and near your adolescent dreams.

Choose to take your big treasure chest of Curiosity off the shelf.

Tags:

Beyond Business | Curiosity - Invention, Innovation & Creativity | Thought Tweets

Living is Learning

by Rick Baker
On Aug 9, 2013

I believe the purpose of life is to learn.

I believe the reason for learning is growth, which takes form as the wisdom needed for personal development, the wisdom needed to understand and constructively interact with other people, and the comfort that comes with a confident relationship with self, others, and The Universe.

I believe the sequence of learning is important:

  • first, we must learn about self,
  • next, we must learn about other people, and
  • then, we must learn about the spiritual.

For most of us, perhaps for almost all of us, the order of learning is disrupted very early in our lives. Perhaps, for many or most of us the disruption starts the very instant we are born. Our learning is disrupted by well-meaning parents, our learning is disrupted by well-meaning figures of authority, and our learning is disrupted by other not-so-well-meaning people and by ignorant, self-serving, and malicious people.

The point is, the order of our learning is disrupted early in our lives.

So, we must at some point in our lives take responsibility for our learning.

I will use the word “I” when I am making what I think could be more-contentious points. That will impress my view - life philosophy is a most-personal thing. I feel no need to give instruction or even claim my instruction would contain any value for others. I do feel some need to share.

This is part of a Philosophy of and for Life…

 

The Importance of the Learning Sequence

Human beings are easily influenced during their early, developmental years. We are totally dependent on others for quite some time. That’s a fact of life. During our years of infancy, we develop deep and long-lasting relationships with people, many of whom:

  • do not have life philosophies or
  • have adopted more-or-less by accident the life philosophies of others or
  • emulate bits and pieces of the life philosophies of heroes or
  • have a fuzzy life philosophy backed by a few good sayings borrowed from others or ancient wisdom. 

'Other people' includes parents, siblings, grandparents, kith, and kin. Next, 'other people' includes a variety of relationships with a range of people outside the family and near-neighbours: church people, store people, people who visit parks and playgrounds, caregivers, teachers, figures of other authorities, etc.

During our years of infancy we experience incredible growth, much of it visible to others and even more of it happening beyond visibility. We learn about others. We learn about self. Our learning is rudimentary, practical, and critical. We learn about mothers smiles. We learn about our hands and mouths.

We learn ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ and we learn ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. And we learn much, much more…at an extremely rapid pace. When we are infants our early learning is captured by our fragile, developing minds. It registers. To the extent it impresses and to the extent it is repeated it becomes our personal set of experiences, knowledge, and memories.

All of our early learning is skewed by the actions, the needs, and the beliefs of other people.

As an infant and a child I was incapable of having a Life Philosophy. My mind was simply neither ready nor capable. This incapability carried on then diminished through my adolescence, early manhood, and into mid-life. When it comes to Life Philosophy - compared to some I am a late-bloomer; compared to others, I suspect I am a rest-of-a-lifetime ahead.

I recall, from as far back as I can remember, feeling a resistance to certain actions taken by other people. I have early memories of my parents, whose actions I remember loving, hating, and wondering about. I remember my sister, hardly any bigger than I, always caring for me and protecting me. I remember registering an aversion and a resistance to childhood bullies and certain authorities who took the form of friends’ fathers. I am recalling my nursery-school years and my tonsillectomy: My feelings and sensory observations are still crystal clear…even though fifty years have passed. Similarly, I remember registering at a very young age an aversion to and a resistance to formal religion. I remember clamping my teeth and silently accepting the physical discipline delivered to me by our school principal…knowing I had earned what I was receiving. I remember my internal forces pushing me to be the prankster, and I remember the encouraging faces and words of my young friends.

As I can recall and see very clearly, prior to and during my first years of schooling I was too young to have a Life Philosophy. Not so clearly understood by me is why it took the better part of half a century for me to figure one out. On the other hand, the need to understanding why it took so long is not strong...just a mild curiosity. I have one now and that is all that is important for the present and for the future.

I hope this clarifies why I believe the learning must follow a sequence and why I believe the learning sequence must start with learning about and understanding self. To develop my philosophy of life, I had to consider my past as objectively as possible and work to answer:

  • What motivated my thoughts and actions?
  • How did other people impact on my thoughts and actions?
  • What improvements would I like to experience vis-à-vis the ways of the past?
  • What Philosophy of Life would help me achieve those improvements?

As I considered these questions I knew seven things with certainty:

  1. I needed a Philosophy of Life.
  2. I needed to reach a conclusive decision about the spiritual aspect of my Philosophy of Life.
  3. I needed to use thought, feeling, and intuition to build my Philosophy of Life.
  4. I needed to consider, weigh, and self-test the written views of a large number of disparate people prior to finalising my Philosophy of Life.
  5. I needed to ensure my Philosophy of Life focused first on my needs and desires then on consideration of the needs and desires of other people.
  6. I needed to consider the effect of my Philosophy of Life on the people most-dear to me.
  7. I needed to consider the effect of my Philosophy of Life on my future work.

Tags:

Beyond Business | Curiosity - Invention, Innovation & Creativity

Thinking about Process...and Creativity

by Rick Baker
On Jul 25, 2013

All aspects of everything we do, whether creative or not, involve process. Thought involves process. Emptying a dishwasher involves process. Innovation involves process. Eating a chocolate bar involves process. Going to the moon involves process.

Not eating a chocolate bar, to the extent we do it with thought, involves process.

Creativity involves process – always.

On a micro scale: our bodies are laced with processes – electrical, chemical, and mechanical. On a macro scale:  the methods that put men on the moon were complicated processes.

Creativity and innovation are results of combinations of processes our bodies perform. That applies at the micro level and at the macro level.

I think that's an important point for a number of reasons.

If creativity happens without process then processes do not influence creativity. In addition, anyone who believes he or she can teach or learn creativity is a wrong-thinker.

Clearly, there is much evidence to confirm creativity involves processes and in the absence of processes there can be no creativity. The same applies to innovation, (which is part of a process that starts with curiosity and creativity). Perhaps the strongest proof of this is the fact that the human body relies upon electricity to exist. Without micro electrical processes our brains and bodies would cease to function let alone be creative. From that micro level, moving from inside to outside, we can see much evidence that creativity relies on other processes. As one next-step-out example, we must eat to fuel the electrical processes that energize our bodies and our brains. As an example of another-step-out, our brain cells rely on blood flow. Without blood flow our brain cells quickly die…taking our ability to think creatively with them. So, our brain processes rely on our heart processes.

As another step out toward macro – the neurons in our brains operate under processes. (see for example, Ray Kurzweil's recent book 'How to Create a Mind') These neuronal processes are (at least) guided by our DNA. DNA is all about process. (see Richard Dawkins' recent book 'The Magic of Reality')

Our senses deliver perceptions to our brains and our brains house that information…for future use. Human beings learn through a process of perceiving, storing, recognizing patterns, retrieving, etc. And, creativity relies on all those processes.

Here's a different view about creativity vis-à-vis right and wrong: creativity is not about right and wrong. If it can be summed up in one word, creativity is about 'new'. People have different perceptions…because people are different.

When people perceive and think the same way and accept a situation, there is little ability to experience creativity. When people perceive and think different ways and accept a situation, creativity has a much easier time presenting itself. When people judge others as wrong, the likelihood of creativity arising or evolving into invention or innovation drops. When people accept others as being different and are OK not judging the differences as right or wrong, minds tend to be more open to new ideas…and creativity, invention, and innovation have an opportunity to flourish. 

Gravity & Levity: Why-How Opposites Attract [WHOA]

by Rick Baker
On Jun 13, 2013

Gravity & Levity: polar opposites, each laced with double entendre.

Gravity was Zarathustra’s archenemy. Gravity is the fabric of Newton’s legacy. And, when I first heard John Mayer’s song ‘Gravity’ I was blown away…like Aristotle envisioned fire escaping gravity and levitating to the sphere of the moon’s orb…where the light is.

Seneca saw levity as the bone of all good and virtuous. George Bernard Shaw believed levity to be the best package for communicating the right things to say. And, when I first read Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s ‘Antifragile’ I solidified my thinking about the importance of blending polar opposites into our lives…and our decisions.

Then I read Galileo’s ‘Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems’: gravity & levity became front and centre in my thoughts…and they stayed there…two polar opposites, hand-in-hand, sharing centre stage.

While some see him as dark, I think Nietzsche is the most-interesting philosopher…brilliant beyond bi-polar…meshing messages of and with gravity & levity: 

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.

“The certain prospect of death could sweeten every life with a precious and fragrant drop of levity – and now you strange apothecary souls have turned into an ill-tasting drop of poison that makes the whole of life repulsive.”

“I would believe only in a God that knows how to Dance.”

 Friedrich Nietzsche

[1844-1900]

 

***

 

Why-How Opposites Attract [WHOA]

WHY?

  • An intentional blend of gravity & levity helps ensure variety and moderation.
  • An intentional blend of gravity & levity promotes balance and curiosity.
  • An intentional blend of gravity & levity builds character.

HOW?

  • Read works that blend gravity & levity…as examples, choose Nietzsche over Newton…choose Twain and Taleb
  • Listen to works that blend gravity & levity...from the Beatles to Beethoven…with some Wagner samplers in between
  • Experience the gravity & levity of the arts…from Michelangelo's David to David Blaine...without riding on high horses

OPPOSITES ATTRACT!

  • Gravity keeps our feet on the ground; Levity places our head above our feet.
  • Gravity attracts one body to another; Levity adds dance to their relationship.
  • Gravity draws and centres; Levity enjoys new horizons.

 

So, when it comes to gravity & levity I will pay attention to When-How Opposites Attract.

And I am with Nietzsche and Mayer, if I must choose between gravity & levity…

WHOA gravity, stay the hell away from me

 

 

Gravity & Levity: the Meaning & History of the Words

Source: Online Etymological Dictionary

gravity (n.)

c.1500, "weight, dignity, seriousness," from Middle French gravité "seriousness, thoughtfulness," and directly from Latin gravitatem (nominative gravitas) "weight, heaviness, pressure," from gravis "heavy" (see grave (adj.)). The scientific sense of "force that gives weight to objects" first recorded 1640s.

 levity (n.)

"want of seriousness, frivolity," 1560s, from Latin levitatem (nominative levitas) "lightness, frivolity," from levis "light" in weight (see lever) + -ity.

 

 

 

Thought Tweet #752

by Rick Baker
On Jun 4, 2013

Thought Tweet #752 Think in new ways; think in old ways...just don't waste time dabbling in-between.

 

The Thinking Behind The Tweet

Wisdom survives the test of timeCuriosity & Creativity are essential things.

It's the stuff in-between that wastes time, injures attitude, and accomplishes little.

Create a How To Think list

Copyright © 2012. W.F.C (Rick) Baker. All Rights Reserved.