Rick Baker Thought Posts
Left Menu Space Holder

About the author

Name of author Rick Baker, P.Eng.

E-mail me Send mail
Follow me LinkedIn Twitter

Search

Calendar

<<  November 2024  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
2345678

View posts in large calendar

Recent Comments

Comment RSS

Thought Tweet #836

by Rick Baker
On Sep 30, 2013

Thought Tweet #836 Trust: it's a dynamic thing that flows 2 ways; you extend it in order to receive it; it's about Action.

 

The Thinking Behind The Tweet

Quality character is a gift.

A pleasing personality is a powerful gift.

But...

Actions easily trump both.

Ensure your Actions score winning points.

Tags:

Influencing | Personalities @ Work | Thought Tweets

Saying "No" & Seeking Simple

by Rick Baker
On Sep 27, 2013

Many big businesses are struggling with downsizing, rightsizing, and other kinds of sizing activities that are aimed at reducing costs and building efficiencies. As big companies do these sizing things they regularly use strategies that foist work on smaller businesses. Sometimes the big businesses insist their suppliers do the extra work...the auto sector and Walmart have embraced this strategy for decades. Sometimes the big businesses insist their customers do the extra work...perhaps that's what the insurance companies are doing right now.

In any event, much work is off-loaded from the backs of big businesses onto the backs of small businesses.

In many instances, the small business people accept this as a fact of life. Small businesses who serve as suppliers to the auto sector have informed me in no uncertain terms, "We must accept this as a cost of doing business." And, I've let them know just how fragile their business model is and always will be if they accept that way of thinking.

Why are these people more-or-less oblivious to the fact they have choices?

Have any of these people taken the time to understand the 80/20 Rule?

Why don't these people perform cost/benefit analyses or some other analyses that will help them understand saying "Yes" is killing their businesses?

Why are these people so hungry for volume they bite off huge chunks of extra work then choke on them?

Why don't these small-business people at least make an attempt to simplify or, better still, automate the work that gets dumped on them by the big businesses?

I know how they'd answer those questions.

"We're too busy to figure out stuff like that."

  • Too busy to seek out 3rd Alternatives
  • Too busy to borrow brilliance from other business sectors
  • Too busy to negotiate
  • Too busy to learn better ways

No kidding...

Of course they're too busy!

They're too busy doing work that has been discarded by other folks who know they cannot afford to do it.

***

True entrepreneurs don't let their businesses get caught in these sorts of traps.

True entrepreneurs see the problem coming at them.

As the problem approaches they make a quick decision: does this Problem contain the seeds of an Opportunity?

'Yes' or 'No'?

Quickly now, 'Yes' or 'No'?

If 'No' then simply don't accept the off-loaded work.

If 'Yes' then figure out how - innovate how - to take on the extra work and gain profit from it.

And - sometimes 'Yes' means the creation of a new service or product.

And sometimes 'Yes' means the creation of a new small business.

And, on occasion 'Yes' means the discovery of a gold mine.

And... Regularly, people think or say - "Why didn't I think of that?"

...Exactly!

Thought Tweet #835.5

by Rick Baker
On Sep 27, 2013

Thought Tweet #835.5 Your brain is pre-programmed to conserve your energy. Don't make your brain go against its grain. Avoid multi-tasking. 

 

The Thinking Behind The Tweet

Our brains are amazing things. They automatically sort information. They automatically recognize patterns. They automatically do all sorts of functions to minimize the use of energy. Then we go and mess all that up by trying to do too many things simultaneously. We multi-task our brains. As a result, we force our brains to operate in a low, grinding gear. Not efficient. Not effective.

Tags:

Brain: about the Human Brain | Thought Tweets

Thought Tweet #835

by Rick Baker
On Sep 27, 2013

Thought Tweet #835 You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear...but you can make a doggie treat...& maybe you can make a porcine purse.

 

The Thinking Behind The Tweet

Don't try to fit square talent pegs into round tasks. Don't burn up your energy battling weakness after weakness. Play to your strengths. 

There's a very-lucrative pet-food market and dogs have quite an appetite for treats.

There's a very-lucrative clothing and accessory industry...it's just possible porcine purses could be the next fashion rage. 

Sow's ears have their place in the world's economy. But, that place isn't in the raw material sections of silk-purse production plants.

Tags:

Humour | STRENGTHS: People-Focused for Success | Thought Tweets

Thought Tweet #834.5

by Rick Baker
On Sep 26, 2013

Thought Tweet #834.5 Values are the ground rules that drive actions/behaviour. Shared values are the ground rules for behaviour in business.

 

The Thinking Behind The Tweet

When there is clarity around and embracing of shared values:

  • actions are magnetized in desired directions
  • people behave well
  • relationships are harmonious
  • goals are clearer
  • goals are achieved
  • profits are greater
  • people are energized

Tags:

Thought Tweets | Values: Personal Values

2 Different Ways to Solve Problems

by Rick Baker
On Sep 26, 2013

While the symptoms of many business problems are straightforward, the roots of many business problems are not straightforward. Often the roots of business problems are concealed under a shroud of human behaviour.

To solve business problems we need to do one of two things:

  1. We need to get to their roots and inject remedies at the root level or
  2. We need to replace the existing processes with processes we believe will work.

The more time I spend helping business people remedy serious business problems the more I'm swayed to favour the second approach.

Here are some thoughts about each approach...

Finding the roots of business problems and making changes around those roots in order to remove the problem:

Three things combine to cause business problems. Those three things are people, process, and situations. To the extent you chose the people, designed the processes, and accurately anticipated the situations those people and processes would experience you have ability to understand where things went off course…you have the ability to understand the root cause (or causes) where the problem began (or escalated). All else being equal, the better you know the people, processes, and situations the higher the likelihood you will be able to zero in on the root causes of problems. 'All else being equal' assumes there is no people-baggage or ego-challenge that will confound your ability to investigate the causes behind the problems.

Ignoring the root causes of problems and replacing the existing processes that lead to the problem with well-thought-out processes that remove the opportunity for the problem to continue

When you really stop to think about it, most business processes are simple strings of tasks. The tasks are performed by people or they are performed by machines, which are operated/managed by people. Most business processes happen in a limited number of different situations, which can be anticipated (with forethought). Leaders or managers (either with or without the help of the people involved) can consider the desired outcomes, think through the range of situations, and define the people requirements and the processes required to complete the necessary tasks.

Both approaches to problem solving can generate solutions. If one approach fails then the other can be used as 'Plan B'.

The question is,

What approach should be pursued first?

Often, newcomers favour the 2nd approach...for the wrong reason. Newcomers want to make their mark and prove what they know. That's the wrong reason to favour the 2nd approach because proving what you know is almost guaranteed to alienate people and deprive the newcomer the opportunity to understand the details of the processes.

Often, founders or long-term people use only the 1st approach.  Being familiar with the people and the processes founders and long-term people are confident they can quickly get to the roots of problems. Sometimes they achieve quick positive results much like a teacher can help a student correct an answer to a math question. Sometimes their solutions do not work despite their crystal-clear impression the solution is the right solution. When this happens, there's a high chance the roots of the problems are concealed in shrouds of human behaviour. There's also a high chance the solution efforts will stall and the problem will live on.

It is important to step back when a serious problem arrives. It is important to consider the best way to address serious problems.

If you are a newcomer, do you want to risk alienating people? Depending on the situation that could be the absolute worst thing to do...or it could be the absolute best thing to do.

If you have been in your role for a long period, do you want to presume you can quickly find the root of the problem? Depending on the situation that could be the absolute worst thing to assume...or it could be the absolute best thing to assume.

The more I help business leaders address their problems, the more I'm inclined to:

• first, understand the desired outcome

• next, focus on the situations

• next, develop a solid process that ensures the desired outcome

• then, present the new approach in a way that influences people to buy-in

To be clear: while that's my favoured approach, I know it does not fit certain situations and will not work with certain people. 

Tags:

Solutions & Opportunities

Copyright © 2012. W.F.C (Rick) Baker. All Rights Reserved.