Rick Baker Thought Posts
Left Menu Space Holder

About the author

Name of author Rick Baker, P.Eng.

E-mail me Send mail
Follow me LinkedIn Twitter

Search

Calendar

<<  December 2024  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

View posts in large calendar

Recent Comments

Comment RSS

Brain neuroplasticity: is it overrated?

by Rick Baker
On May 27, 2011
I think we should focus on strengths.
 
We should spend time working on our strengths rather than our weaknesses.
 
So, I have been captured by the good work the people at the Gallup organization have done to create STRENGTHSFINDER.
 
I own copies of all the books written by Marcus Buckingham and by Tom Rath…and I am re-reading all of them.
 
While doing this re-reading, I was slowed down by one section of Marcus Buckingham’s book ‘Now, Discover Your Strengths’. Marcus talked about brain neuroplasticity and he had a strong view that brain neuroplasticity is overrated. His words made it clear he knew the facts – ie, the 2001 facts – about brain neuroplasticity. He knew about neurons and lost-limb work [I immediately thought about Ramachandran], etc.
 
Marcus made it clear he thought people were overestimating the value of using ‘brain plasticity’ activities/exercises to create better results at work. He stressed, at the very least, this is an inefficient way to go about self-improvement.
 
Rather, he recommended [I am using my own words here]:
  • Focus on Strengths…that’s the best place to improve one’s performance
  • When the job/role requires it, patch up Weaknesses…or work around them if that is possible.
Also, Marcus talked about:
  • Talent Themes…how they are innate and cannot be changed
  • Values…how we can choose to adjust them [and adjust our character]
Marcus Buckingham got me thinking.
 
First 
 
I believe people only do 3 things.
 
I believe if we boil things down then people only do 3 things:
  • Good Habits
  • Bad Habits
  • New Things
That’s it. Whether I do things voluntarily or in reaction to some unknown drivers in my involuntary back-up systems, whether I do things in reaction to subconsciously-driven emotions, or whether I logically plan out things and do them…every single thing I do can be sorted into one of 3 categories:
  • Good Habits
  • Bad Habits
  • New Things
Not to get too bogged down in detail [assuming it isn’t already too late], some examples:
  • I breathe whether I want to or not…that’s a Good Habit because it tends to keep me alive
  • I look both ways before I cross the street…that’s a Good Habit my Dear Mom taught me
  • I eat too much ice cream…that’s a Bad Habit because it removes my ability to buy smaller belts
  • I have trouble getting to sleep…that’s a Bad Habit because it wastes time, annoys me, etc
  • I read books…depending on the book that’s a Good Habit [re-reading Napoleon Hill’s ‘Think and Grow Rich’] or that’s a New Thing [when it is my first reading of the book]
  • I took the STRENGTHSFINDER test…that was a New Thing that led to some Good Habits
  • I read plenty of books about the brain: de Bono, Ramachandran, Doidge, Schwartz, Amen, Glynn, Lynch, Maltz, Ratey, Robbins, Calvin, Begley…etc, etc
 
Here’s the point
  
Yes - I read plenty of books about the brain and I am specifically interested in reading about brain neuroplasticity.
 
Putting Marcus Buckingham’s thought together with my philosophy about Good Habits, Bad Habits, & New Things
 
Is that a Good Habit or a Bad Habit?
 
What if I asked Marcus Buckingham, “Marcus, is that a Good Habit or a Bad Habit?”
 
I wonder if Marcus would say, “Rick, that’s a Bad Habit”.
 
I wonder if Marcus would say, “Rick, that’s definitely a Bad Habit because you are not focusing on one of your Strengths!
 
Ouch!
 
  
 
Footnotes
 

Comments (1) -

rick baker
3/28/2012 9:55:44 PM #

"We live in a fathomless sea of plastic mind substance. This substance is ever alive and active, it is sensitive to the highest degree. It takes form according to the mental demand. Thought forms the mould or matrix from which the substance expresses itself."

Charles F. Haanel
'The Master Key - In Twenty-Four Parts', (1912)

Pingbacks and trackbacks (2)+

Add comment

biuquote
Loading

Copyright © 2012. W.F.C (Rick) Baker. All Rights Reserved.