Rick Baker Thought Posts
Left Menu Space Holder

About the author

Name of author Rick Baker, P.Eng.

E-mail me Send mail
Follow me LinkedIn Twitter

Search

Calendar

<<  May 2024  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

View posts in large calendar

Recent Comments

Comment RSS

A Little Argument Against Being Negative

by Rick Baker
On Mar 2, 2015

When you focus on the negatives, you snuff out other peoples candles. What's worse, you smother your own candle...giving it no chance to burn brightly. And, while you are under the power of negative thinking, even when you believe you are going the extra mile and burning your candles at both ends you will never have the chance to shine brightly.

***

Many, if not most, if not all, people have this tendency to skip over the positives and dwell on the negatives. This is part of the human condition.

For some, if not many, people 'the negatives' become the cornerstones of their character. These people are harsh on themselves and more-harsh on other people. These people concentrate on and agonize over everything from petty mistakes to style differences to weather to...etc.

Embedded in each of us there is a spark. We use our sparks to keep our motivation candles lit. We use our sparks to keep our attitudes bright. We use our sparks to generate value for ourselves and for other people.

Unfortunately, some people out there are oblivious to these sparks. Unfortunately, some people carelessly snuff out their own candles and use up their sparks trying to relight their candles, which become increasingly immune to flame. Then, under increased negativity, their candles burn ever and ever dimmer and they are compelled to go after other people's candles. 

Our energy is limited and our sparks are precious. 

Negativity is wasted energy and spark-endangering.


Why not take a SWOT at everything?

by Rick Baker
On Feb 5, 2015

Certainly we should take at SWOT at strategic planning exercises.

But why not take a SWOT at other things?

Why not take a SWOT at decision-making? For example, we could use SWOT when determining how to solve a problem or how to come up with various solutions for problems: we can use the 4 SWOT perspectives to generate solutions [IDEATION] or to test solutions [INTELLECTION] or both.

Why not take a SWOT at hiring decisions? We could assess various candidates under the 4 SWOT perspectives.

Why not use SWOT to fight perfectionism? If are not happy with another person's work we can look at that work from the 4 SWOT perspectives…as a test for reasonableness. Particularly, we can look at the risks and or the threats associated with accepting their work. And we can couple that SWOT with the ‘80% Rule’ where - if the work is 80% is good as we could do it ourselves then there's no need to be working to create a better solution. Obviously, this ties in with delegation – so, we can use SWOT to help us delegate more effectively.

When you think about it, we can take a SWOT at almost everything!

Tags:

Delegation & Decisions | Solutions & Opportunities

Positive change – constructive change - is a process of small improvements.

by Rick Baker
On Jan 28, 2015

Business is about problems & opportunities, an ongoing string of them. Business is about identifying those problems & opportunities and creating options for solving those problems & taking advantage of those opportunities. I believe leading business people agree – of most importance, business is about people believing their efforts will lead to valuable work results and people feeling a level of satisfaction/enjoyment while they are doing their work.

With a little guidance, people can work together and prove most of us are able to agree on small improvements. And, with a little guidance, people can prove many if not most of us want to take solution-actions. These are the first [and the hardest] steps in the process of creating positive, sustainable change…I mean, change that will be of benefit not just to ‘the company’ and its clients but also to each and every person involved [and their families, who rely on them].

Leaders should provide the ‘guidance’ referred to above by organizing and facilitating small task forces.  The task force should embrace the goal of reaching consensus on small changes that will help people grow as individuals, as a team of people, and as a provider of service to clients.

The task force process: short meetings [30 minutes]…encouraging consensus on problems…facilitating consensus on small action steps of improvement…small steps of positive change…with everyone participating…with everyone buying into the actions. 

Tags:

Change: Creating Positive Change | Solutions & Opportunities

When a senior person's competence is being questioned...

by Rick Baker
On Jan 19, 2015

When a senior-team person’s competence is being questioned we leaders have only 3 choices, we can:

1.Be confident the person can do the job. If we select this option then we, as leaders, must help the person succeed. We cannot second guess the person’s capability and/or send signals we think the person is going to fail. We must adjust our mindsets to contain only positive thinking and roll up our sleeves and help.

2.Be confident the person cannot do the job. If we select this option then we must expedite the person’s departure. That’s in everyone’s best interest. Lengthy, unsuccessful discussions about flawed performances sour relationships, kill positive momentum, and sour the business culture. 

3.Be confused about whether the person will succeed and have a plan that will remove that confusion within a set time limit. It is OK for leaders to be confused about a senior person’s abilities as long as (1) they know they are confused, (2) they set time boundaries for removal of that confusion and (3) they set clear action plans to remove that confusion within those time boundaries. 

Tags:

Leaders' Thoughts | Seeking Simple! | Solutions & Opportunities

Getting Stuck on Problems & Seeking Help with Problems

by Rick Baker
On Nov 26, 2014

When we care about producing quality work on time and on budget we take the time to seek out help...that's a natural part of a continuous-improvement mindset.

Some people have that mindset; some people don't have that mindset.

Help comes in many forms and most of the time it comes from other people. Sometimes help comes from clever thinkers whom we have never heard of before. That happened to me recently when I picked up a copy of the audio book called 'Die Empty' [by Todd Henry, 2013]. This book provides some interesting and helpful perspectives and how to be more productive and achieve more success.

Here's an example:

Todd Henry's 4 Elements for Analysing Problems:

  • aspirations
  • affinities
  • assumptions
  • attributes

 

Using these four elements and possibility thinking aspirations, affinities, assumptions, and attributes can help you find the edges of your problem and help you avoid barriers to progress. You can utilize them at the beginning of the project to help you generate a series of questions and you can use them frequently throughout the project to keep you from getting stuck.”

 Todd Henry

 Die Empty’, (2013)


I plan to dig deep into Todd Henry's recommendations, particularly in the area of analysing problems. His work and quality thought will be helpful in many areas...here's a few that jump out at me: P=2S+OSWOT, & project improvement.

Tags:

Solutions & Opportunities

Copyright © 2012. W.F.C (Rick) Baker. All Rights Reserved.